~Back to Lessons~

Philippians

 


Philippians 4.1-4

Philippians 4.8-9
Philippians 4.4-5 Philippians 4.10-13

Philippians 4.6-7

Philippians 4.14-19

 

“THREE COMMANDS IN CHRIST”

Philippians 4.1-4

 

(click here to view in Word format)

 

Introduction 

Moving into Philippians 4, I want you to look at the first four vv. where we have three commands in Christ.  Paul has interspersed through this book warnings against false teachers, warnings against the Judaizers whom he calls in the 3rd ch. “dogs,” “evil workers,” and mutilators of the Gospel of Grace (v. 2), warnings against those who are “enemies of the Cross”— sometimes unbelievers who oppose or distort the Gospel, sometimes believers who oppose and distort the Gospel and who are distracted from the Spiritual Life.  From these warnings he now turns to the Philippians themselves, and he has a few practical areas of command. 

He say’s, “Therefore, my beloved brethren whom I long {to see}, my joy and crown, in this way stand firm in the Lord, my beloved.  I urge Euodia and I urge Syntyche to live in harmony in the Lord.  Indeed, true companion, I ask you also to help these women who have shared my struggle in {the cause of} the gospel, together with Clement also, and the rest of my fellow workers whose names are in the Book of Life.  Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, rejoice!,” Philippians 4:1-4.  V. 4 is, of course, the basic theme of this entire epistle— the power of spiritual joy.  This is a joy which flows from Christ, a joy which is focused on Christ, and a joy which is built on the Work of Christ, on what He accomplished at the Cross.  Jesus said to His disciples in John 15:11, “These things I have spoken to you so that My joy may be in you, and your joy may be made full.”  

In the last section of ch. 3, vv. 17-19, we studied the walk of unbelief.  The spiritual counteraction to that walk of unbelief is the walk of faith, which is commanded of every believer whether he realizes it or not.  The walk of faith leads us into intimate fellowship with the Lord.  And apart from that intimate fellowship it’s impossible for us to even hope to fulfill the commands we have in this section.  These are commands which cannot be applied en masse.  They cannot be applied to other people; they can only be applied to us.  You can apply these to your own personal life and experience; you cannot apply these to someone else. 

Body 

 I.   The Maturity of Spiritual Love— v. 1. 

A.   “Therefore” is a consecutive particle, used in this case to introduce an independent clause.  It’s a term, much like the inferential oun, which looks back on past teaching in order to give us present direction.  V. 1 actually belongs at the end of ch. 3, and when you read it in light of that context it suddenly comes to life.  

1)   “For our citizenship, with all its status, rights and privileges, is in Heaven, from which we eagerly wait with tremendous anticipation for a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ;

who will transform the body of our humble, sin-prone, deathly state into conformity with the body of His brilliant glory, by the power which enables Him to bring everything under His control and authority,” expanded translation of 3:20-21.  In view of the things he’s had to say about focusing on Christ and having the proper attitude— the attitude of spiritual maturity which he mentions in v. 15; the Christian walk which results from living as a citizen of Heaven; our awareness of the fact that as Royal Family members we are Royal Citizens awaiting the appearance of our omnipotent Sovereign, vv. 20-21.  In light of these things he say’s, “Therefore, my beloved brethren whom I long {to see}, …my beloved,” 4:1.  This is the second time in the same v. that Paul uses agapetos, this term of such Christ-like affection for other members of the Royal Family.  What he’s saying is, “to those whom I love with the love of Christ.”  

2)   Here we have expressions of Paul’s spiritual maturity.  Keep in mind that the single greatest evidence of spiritual maturity is not in how much you know, but in how much you apply.  The application of divine viewpoint, and that subsequent growth in the grace and knowledge of God, is going to come forth in this type of attitude toward other believers.  So, Paul expresses his spiritual maturity as he demonstrates the love of Christ for these believers. 

3)   He say’s that he has a great desire; this is found in the phrase those “whom I long to see.”  Here we actually have an adjective, and it means the Philippians are ‘longed for ones, greatly desired ones.’  Earlier in 1:8 he said, “For God is my witness, how I long for you all with the affection of Christ Jesus.”  

Sometimes as we focus on the importance of Biblical clarity, the importance of doctrinal accuracy, we become so focused on the academic and so focused on the intellectual that we actually exclude the idea of any emotional response at all.  That’s an unfortunate thing because until the Word of God has gripped your emotions you’re never going to be completely involved in anything you do.  And you’re never going to possess that ‘spiritual emotion’— that spiritual motivation— the Bible calls “zeal”!  We’ve talked a lot about Paul’s zeal for the plan of God for his life, about Paul’s zeal for the mission of his ministry.  When we lose that zeal for the Word of God and that zeal for the will of God, we’ve lost something precious in our lives. 

B.   In v. 1 we see the care and devotion of a shepherd for his sheep, of a father for his children.  Notice his concern for the spiritual lives of every last one of the sheep he had brought into the fold of Christ.  Paul, once again, shows what tremendous love and affection he had for the Philippian Church.  He calls the Philippians his “joy and” his “crown.”  Right there we can see two things. 

1)   The blessing of joy and fellowship in time.  1 Thessalonians 2:17 say’s, “But we, brethren, having been bereft of you for a short while— in person, not in spirit— were all the more eager with great desire to see your face.”  Why?  Because there was genuine spiritual focus in Paul’s life, in the Thessalonians lives, and in the Philippians lives.  There was an active participation in the plan and purpose of God, and a camaraderie which can only come when people share the same outlook, the same viewpoint, the same perspective in life. 

2)   The wealth of reward in eternity.  Paul said this same thing about the Thessalonian believers.  In 1 Thessalonians 2:19-20 Paul asked, “For who is our hope or joy or crown of exultation?

Is it not even you, in the presence of our Lord Jesus at His coming?  For you are our glory and” our “joy.”  

There is a parallel between these two groups: Philippi and Thessalonica.  They were both small churches, both extremely poor as far as worldly goods and material things, and yet they both possessed the key— a tremendous love for the Word of God and a tremendous dedication to the Son of God.  It’s interesting because in 2 Corinthians 8 Paul defines the “churches of Macedonia”— of which these two were part— by three things: an “abundance of joy,” overflowing even; a “deep poverty,” a destitute condition; and in spite of that, a “wealth of liberality,” a generosity which is free from pretension.  Those things do not characterize churches where the love of believers is not on the Living Word and the written Word!  Those are evidences that they had the hunger and the desire which is so essential to sustaining spiritual momentum. 

C.   Under the ‘Doctrine of Blessing and Reward’ we studied the crown, or wreath, of joy.  This is the wreath which is given for faithfulness in witnessing, for faithfulness in the execution of your ambassadorship.  Understand this principle:  Success in evangelism is based on your willingness to make Christ the issue.  When Paul say’s that the Philippians are his “joy and crown” the word he uses there is ste/fanoj (stephanos).  A stephanos is a wreath, a garland of ivy or oak leaves given to the victorious athlete in the ancient games, or to the triumphant warrior in the defense of his city-state or nation.  It all depended on what games you were competing in as to what the wreath was actually made of; sometimes it was made of wild olive interwoven with parsley and bay leaves. 

1)   You remember that the Greek word stephanos represents phenomenal wealth in eternity.  When an athlete in the ancient games achieved his victory in a particular event, and brought the prestige of that victory home to his city, a multitude of honors awaited him.  E.g.: 

a.   A special entrance was cut into the wall of his hometown which he passed through upon his return.  The wall was then rebuilt and sealed up with an inscription of his name. 

b.   He rode in a victory parade through the streets of the city in its finest chariot. 

c.   He received a lifetime pass to all future games. 

d.   He was given a cash award of somewhere between $10,000-$50,000. 

e.   An ode was written to him by a poet in order to commemorate his feats. 

f.    A sculptor was commissioned by the city to erect a statue of him competing in his event, to capture his strength and grace in the glory of youth— a statue which was to be put up in the public square. 

g.   His children were fed and educated at public expense. 

h.   And, saving the best for last, he was exempt from all income taxes for life!

How about that?  To win this wreath and all it represented was the summit, the pinnacle of the athlete’s ambition. 

2)   There’s something else here.  The stephanos was the wreath with which one crowned his guests at a banquet, at a time of joy and celebration and rejoicing.  There is a beautiful picture in this passage.  Here is the apostle Paul in a Roman prison, chained hand and foot to a Praetorian Guard, his mind and motivation riveted not on the temporal, not on his own miserable circumstances, but on the spiritual.  His care and concern is on the life, spirituality, and service of these young churches— some of which he himself had established and some of which he hadn’t. 

What he’s saying is that the Philippians are the crowning achievement of his labor in the cause of Christ.  At the Banquet Table of the King they will be his festal wreath, the demonstration of his joy.  If there is one lesson to learn right here I think it’s this:  The greatest joy you and I will have in eternity is not in the amount of rewards we’ve amassed; the greatest joy you and I will have is in those we’ve led to Christ.  That brings us to this principle:  The greatest joy in life is leading another soul to Jesus Christ!  The apostle Paul looked at these people knowing that they were going to Heaven because he gave them the Gospel, knowing that they had eternal life because he explained to them the way of faith; and so he say’s to the Philippians, “You are my joy and you are my crown.” 

D.   Paul uses the phrase “in the Lord” three times in the first four vv. of this ch.  We know that there are no more important words for the Church Age believer than “in the Lord,” “in Christ,” “in Him,” “in the Beloved.”  Because what they signify is our inseparable union with the King of Kings!  In Romans 8:35 Paul asks, “Who will separate us from the love of Christ?”  He goes on to mention every possible situation of pressure and adversity imaginable.  And then in v. 38 he reaches this conclusion: “For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing will be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.”  

Not only do these words picture the security of our salvation, they represent all the wealth, riches, and resources of God, which are the birthright of every believer— all the power and provision made available to us through Christ!  In Ephesians 1:3 Paul say’s, “Blessed {be} the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly {places} in Christ.”  When Paul uses this phrase here at the beginning of ch. 4, he’s giving us three significant commands in Christ. 

II.          Three Commands in Christ— vv. 1-4. 

A.   The first is a command to be stable, to exercise stability in our spiritual warfare.  Paul say’s, “Therefore, my beloved brethren [my siblings and children in / Royal Family of God]… stand firm in the Lord….”  I want you to see this right from the outset.  It is only by our occupation with Jesus Christ that we can stand firm, it is only by our occupation with Christ that we can resist the seductions of temptation and the cowardice of arrogance.  When Paul sets forth the command to “stand firm,” he uses a form of histemi, the root of the Roman soldier’s battle cry— Stete!

Stete is the aor. imper., the military command Paul uses in Ephesians 6:14 when he say’s, “Stand firm therefore….”  

1)   The word Paul uses here is the pres. act. imper. of sth/kw (steko)- stand firm; persevere in battle; keep one’s footing.  The act. voice means that the duty of spiritual stability is laid squarely on our shoulders.  The pres. imper. is a command to ‘keep on standing firm, to keep on persevering in conflict with our enemies.’  

Paul uses a qualifying word in this v., the adverb houtos.  Houtos means- ‘in this manner,’ which is close to what we have in our translation.  Houtos implies two things:  

a.   That this is something they had been doing.  In 1:27 he commends them for “standing firm in one spirit, with one mind striving together for the faith of the gospel;” and in 2:12 he say’s, “so then, my beloved, just as you have always obeyed….”  “Always obeyed” means that they were faithful to follow divine instruction, they were faithful in their application of the Word, even when the one by whom it came was not present. 

b.   That this is an evidence of their maturity.  Not only was this something they had been doing, it was the evidence that they were making further progress in the plan of God.  He mentions this in 3:15-16.  “In this manner stand firm in the Lord”— what manner?  According to the ‘attitude of perfection,’ the attitude of maturity, and this level of growth “to which we have attained,” vv. 15-16.  ‘Let us keep on holding ground in the spiritual realm!’  Why?  Because this is an outward demonstration of our spiritual growth. 

2)   Steko is a word which would’ve been used for a soldier standing fast in the shock of battle with the enemy surging down upon him, for a soldier holding his ground despite the fury and onslaught of an opponent’s charge.  Like those three hundred valiant Spartan warriors who squared off against a myriad of Persians, Medes, Scythians, and others at the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 BC.  

3)   As anyone who’s ever been in a fight will tell you, holding your ground is impossible if you panic; therefore, our only safeguard against temptation and arrogance— which is the root of all sin— is to reckon, to calculate, to consider in the face of adversity what is ours in Christ eternally!  That means every ounce of divine power and provision that belongs to us.  This is going to require focus, it’s going to require concentration; it’s going to demand a soul that is saturated with divine viewpoint.  Two quick principles before we move on. 

a    The local church will stand firm only so long as Christ is the focal point of everything it does.  He must be the Alpha and Omega of its teaching, its instruction, its evangelism, its outreach, every area of service, or else it fails, plain and simple. 

b.   The individual believer will stand fast, holding his ground against the enemy, only when he is occupied with Jesus Christ.  Occupation with Christ means a zeal, a fire, a passionate love affair with the Son of God.  And our passion for the Son of God is evidenced by our hunger and thirst for the Word of God! 

4)   I think sometimes we get so caught up in the academic side of Bible study that we forget about the practical power for life of being occupied with Christ.  Now, a few points on ‘Occupation with the Person of Jesus Christ.’ 

a.   As personal love for God matures, occupation with Christ becomes a reality.  Hebrews 3:1 urges us, to “…consider Jesus, the Apostle and High Priest of our confession.”  This is a very intense word for “consider,” katanoe/w (katanoeo)- observe and perceive very carefully.  Katanoeo was used in Greek literature for the immersion of oneself in a subject, for a total mental absorption in it, and thus an entire comprehension of it. 

b.   Occupation with Christ is the supreme problem-solving device.  What it solves is the ‘priority problem’ of the Spiritual Life.  It prevents us from getting distracted by pseudo-priorities, by inconsequential details, by things which are not only distracting but ultimately destructive— destructive to our progress as Royal Priests in the plan of God, destructive to our impact as Royal Ambassadors of Christ, and destructive to our service as Royal Ministers of grace.  Four principles we need to get under point number two. 

i.    Preoccupation with self results from taking your eyes off Christ.  This is self- centeredness as opposed to Christ-centeredness. 

ii.    Preoccupation with people comes from getting your eyes on others.  This is usually a consequence of iconoclastic arrogance, of setting someone up as your idol and then worshipping this other person.  You better get it down: Everybody in life will let you down sooner or later, everyone you know will disappoint you somewhere along the way, including, yes, even your pastor.  You might as well be realistic and not naïve. 

iii.   Preoccupation with things results from a false perception of what is the true source of joy and happiness in life.  We have only one true source of happiness and of hope— of confident, absolute assurance— and that’s in orientation to the will, purpose, and plan of God for our lives. 

iv.   You can bank on this:  When believers have false priorities, they inevitably have preventable problems.  Peter told a group of believers under intense persecution in Asia Minor how to solve the ‘priority problem.’  He said, “sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts,” 1 Peter 3:15.  What that means is to put Jesus Christ in His rightful place— first place, the place of preeminence— in every area of your life. 

c.   Occupation with Christ characterizes the mature believer.  Paul summed up his outlook and perspective on life when in 1:21 he said, “For to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain.”  We’ve seen in the past that there are no ‘be’ verbs in the Greek of this v.  So, what it’s really saying is, “to live— Christ, and to die— gain.”  For the apostle Paul life is Christ, and Christ is life.  Now that is a mature believer.  

d.   While characterizing spiritual maturity, it is impossible to attain maturity unless we are already occupied with Jesus Christ.  

e.   Christianity is a relationship, not a religion.  Paul in 2 Timothy 1:12 did not say, “I know what I have believed,” but “I know whom I have believed and I am convinced that He is able to guard what I have entrusted to Him until that day.”  The Spiritual Life is about the intimacy of relationship, not the intricacies of religion. 

f.    The purpose of all our study is to move from the written Word to the Living Word, to seek from the page the Person of Jesus Christ.  Paul understood this probably as well as anybody in history, which is why in Philippians 3:10 he wraps the goal of his entire life up in five words— “that I may know Him.”  Not about Him, not the facts and details of this event or that event, but Him personally and intimately, which translates into experientially.  That’s why in the rest of v. 10 Paul speaks of the “power of His resurrection and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death.”  

5)   {Cf. Psalm 63.}  The title of this is ‘A Psalm of David, when he was in the wilderness of Judah.’  The background of this Psalm deals with the ‘Absalom rebellion,’ when David was forced to flee, around 974 BC, across the Jordan and into the dry and dusty wilderness, leaving behind his home, his kingdom, and the power and authority of his throne.  He begins with the declaration, “O God, You are my God; I shall seek You earnestly [Heb. verb shachar means- ‘look diligently for something;’ it implies / inner motivation of a soul occupied with / Person of Christ]; My soul thirsts for You, my flesh yearns for You [word here means- ‘faint with longing’], in a dry and weary land [an ‘exhausted desert’] where there is no water [this is David’s expression of spiritual hunger and desire, that necessary thirst for / knowledge of God which leads to growth and progress in / plan and power of grace].  Thus I have seen You in the sanctuary, to see Your power and Your glory.”  

In v. 3 you can see David’s thoughts turn to the overwhelming goodness of God.  “Because Your lovingkindness is better than life, My lips will praise You [‘lovingkindness’ is from  , and chesed is one of / Heb. words for grace; underlying this word are three basic ideas which constantly interact with one another— {1} strength, {2} loyalty, and {3} love; in God’s relationship to us as individual believers it means- faithfulness, kindness, grace; all those things are wrapped up in this one magnificent word].”  

David was a man who understood, implicitly, that ‘there but for the grace of God go I.’  David knew without a shadow of a doubt that his kingdom, his family, his wealth, his victories in warfare, and even his own faith in the Word of God were resources, divine assets provided by the grace of God.  That’s why in Psalm 13:5-6 he could say with boldness and assurance, “I have trusted in Your lovingkindness; My heart shall rejoice in Your salvation.  I will sing to the LORD because He has dealt bountifully with me;” and in Psalm 21, a song of thanksgiving from the nation on behalf of their king, “O LORD, in Your strength the king will be glad, and in Your salvation how greatly he will rejoice!  ...For the king trusts in the LORD, and through the lovingkindness of the Most High he will not be shaken,’’ vv. 1 and 7.

 

“So I will bless You as long as I live; I will lift up my hands in Your name [an expression of worship and devotion].  My soul is satisfied as with marrow and fatness [‘satisfied’ means- ‘be fulfilled, have one’s desire satiated completely’],

and [as a result of this intense spiritual satisfaction] my mouth offers praises with joyful lips.”  In v. 6 he say’s, “When I remember You on my bed, I meditate on You in the night watches [Qal stem of   zakar, translated ‘remember,’ means- call to mind, recall in the soul; in / Class. Heb. of David’s time this word was used for / function of / heart, for thinking about someone, for meditating on something and paying very careful attention to it; this is not just a fleeting thought here and there but it gives us a picture of David passing through / night absorbed in reflection on / faithfulness, / provision, and / protection of / Lord God of Israel, Jesus Christ], for You have been my help and in the shadow of Your wings I sing for joy [I love this phrase, / ‘shadow of Your wings;’ it’s an idiom for divine protection; David uses it in at least four different places in / Pss.: 17:8; 36:7; 57:1; and here].  My soul clings to You; Your right hand upholds me [‘upholds’ means- support, hold fast, i.e., ‘Your right hand,’ which pictures / strength and power of God, ‘stabilizes me’].”  There is a principle for us here:  Despite pressure and pain, suffering and even scandal, God will stabilize the believer who keeps his eyes focused on Christ. 

“In vain the surges angry shock,

In vain the drifting sands:

Unharmed upon the Eternal Rock,

The Eternal City stands.”

B.   In v. 2 Paul say’s, “I urge Euodia and I urge Syntyche to live in harmony in the Lord.”  The verb parakale/w (parakaleo), translated “I urge” here, is a very strong word in the Greek language.  It means- beg, exhort someone, implore or entreat this person; and Paul repeats it for emphasis, to demonstrate his desire for harmony in the Body of Christ.  Apparently there was a quarrel or disagreement of some kind.  Remember that the early Church met in homes; some scholars have suggested that groups of believers met in each of these ladies’ homes— one Jewish and one Gentile— and that maybe there was an inordinate competition between the two.  In any case, this is a personal appeal to each of these women. 

1)   We have a very interesting construction in v. 2.  Paul uses the pres. act. inf. of frone/w (phroneo).  The infinitive is normally used to show the purpose or result of the finite verb, which is how it’s translated in the NAS: “I implore Euodia and Syntyche, I entreat them.  To what?  To live in harmony.”  But what we have here is called the “imperative infinitive,” a usage with a very “ancient origin …especially frequent in Homer.”  Dana & Mantey, Manual Grammar of the Greek NT, p. 216  This is the exact same construction Paul used in Philippians 3:16 when he said, “let us keep living by that same {standard} to which we have attained.”  In that passage he uses to auto stoichein; here he uses to auto phronein.  

a.   Phroneo means- think the same thing, i.e., put aside whatever discord and dissension exists and to be in agreement.  

b.   The ‘imperfect inf.’ phronein— in the pres. tense and act. voice— is Paul’s command to these Christian women, and to all believers, to “live in perpetual harmony in the Lord, to keep on finding that common ground of agreement in Christ.”  How do we do this?  By thinking the same thing.  This goes back to the training ground of the spiritual life:

study and application of the Word of God, the preparation and practice of faith. You can’t take one without the other; they belong together in the plan of God. 

c.   Paul talked about this earlier in ch. 2.  ‘Thinking the same thing, being of the same mind in the Lord’ means: {1} To see the other person as you see yourself in the Lord; and {2} to take that step above and beyond, and see this other person as more important than yourself.  Listen to the expanded translation from our study of Philippians 2:3-4: “Doing nothing under the compulsion of selfish ambition or empty pride, but with a humble attitude of soul each consider the other as your superior.  Do not focus on your own concerns to the exclusion of a care for the concerns of other people.”  When an attack comes, there is always a diminishing of the other person, a cutting down, a marginalizing of the other party.  As long as that is happening there is no “harmony in the Lord.”  

2)   “Euodia” is a fem. name, and it means- ‘pleasant or prosperous journey.’  There was a tradition among believers in the early Church of laying aside their pre-Christian names and taking a new one at baptism.  In that sense, believer’s names often reveal something about their spiritual lives or spiritual character.  ‘Euodia’ was a woman who, in her own spiritual journey, had arrived at a certain level of growth.  There was only one problem— that problem’s name was ‘Syntyche.’  

3)   “Syntyche” comes from the verb suntugchano, meaning- ‘to meet with;’ its cognate noun suntuchia means- an ‘occurrence, a happening, an incident,’ and by extension ‘good fortune, success.’  “Syntyche” lit. means- ‘with fortune, with destiny;’ this is someone who obviously understood her place in the plan of God.  Maybe the effort she’d put forth to open her heart and her home to the Body of Christ was a cause of envy for Euodia.  I don’t know, but what I do know is that Paul calls these women “fellow-laborers” in the cause of Christ. 

One of the things we see not only in the ministry of Christ but also in the ministry of the apostle Paul is the prominence of women.  Funny how after nearly two thousand years things haven’t changed so much after all.  They’re always in a subordinate role, always in a proper place and perspective, and yet, some of the greatest believers of the 1st cent. were women. 

a.   Starting with Mary, the sister of Martha and Lazarus.  The 11th ch. of the Gospel of John tells of what great love and affection our Lord had for this family.  And this lady was in tune with the divine plan; she had a depth of understanding about the Mission of the Messiah that the disciples could only dream of!  Remember that it was she who had “anointed the Lord with ointment and wiped His feet with her hair” in John 11:2. 

b.   In Luke 8 it says, that when Christ began “going around from one city and village to another proclaiming and preaching the Kingdom of God, the twelve were with Him.  And {also} some women who had been healed of evil spirits and sicknesses: Mary who was called Magdalene [meaning- ‘of Magdala;’ Magdala was a very small but very wealthy city on / western shore of / Sea of Galilee, infamous for its prostitution], from whom seven demons had gone out [according to / early Church, it was this same Mary— a famous courtesan in / ancient world— who, in / home of a self-righteous Pharisee {is there any other kind?} had washed Jesus’ feet with her tears, wiped them with her hair, and then kissed them over and over as she anointed them with perfume; / Scriptures classify her as one who had been ‘devoted to sin,’ and / fact that her hair was loose and unbound was / sign of her particular profession; I suppose / reason those feet were so precious to her is because they brought forgiveness from / Son of God, a forgiveness offered in love— and before her meeting with / Messiah that was something unimaginable to her, something inconceivable; yet it was this precisely, her faith in / Lord Jesus Christ, which had saved her and brought her into a relationship of peace with God {Lk. 7:36-50}; if not for / ‘Christ-encounter,’ she would’ve been buried in history as some unknown hooker; but somewhere along / way, at some point in her life, / beauty of grace had overwhelmed her, / grace of / Lord Jesus Christ had touched her soul and set her free, in a way that only grace can], and Joanna the wife of Chuza, Herod’s steward, and Susanna, and many others who were contributing to their [ / disciples] support out of their private means,” vv. 1-3.  

c.   Mark 15:40 says that at the Crucifixion, after every one else had fled, “there were …{some} women looking on from a distance, among whom {were} Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the Less and Joses, and Salome [ / mother James and John, two of / three ‘inner circle’ of disciples];” in v. 41 Mark say’s, “When He was in Galilee, they used to follow Him and minister to Him; and {there were} many other women who came up with Him to Jerusalem.”  

d.   In Paul’s ministry to the Roman colony of Philippi, who was his first convert?  Lydia… and a very faithful one at that.  Luke in Acts 16:13-14 say’s, “on the Sabbath day we went outside the gate to a riverside, where we were supposing that there would be a place of prayer [this was a Jewish custom in cities where no synagogue existed, to worship by a body of water]; and we sat down and began speaking to the women who had assembled.  A woman named Lydia, from the city of Thyatira, a seller of purple fabrics, a worshiper of God [phrase indicates that, more than likely, she was a ‘proselyte’ to Judaism; Lydia], was listening [there you see / concentration of positive volition, / hunger of spiritual desire]; and the Lord opened her heart [HS’s magnificent ministry of common grace] to respond to the things spoken by Paul.”  

4)   As he goes along in v. 3 he talks about these women, and others, who were ‘engaged in the conflict of Christ.’  He say’s, they “have shared my struggle in the Gospel;” the NIV translates this as, “have contended at my side in the cause of the Gospel.”  This phrase comes from the same word he used in 1:27, sunathleo- ‘strive or struggle alongside someone.’  Sunathleo was used for a team of athletes striving together towards the same goal; it is a metaphor from the ancient arena.  Paul said, “They are my fellow-warriors on the battlefield of life.”  That’s a pretty high mark for anybody, man or woman, wouldn’t you say? 

Let me ask you this:  In the end, when time has passed us by and no further opportunity remains, what will the record of our lives be?  That we ‘strove together as a team for Christ, that we fought side by side in the cause of the Gospel,’ or that we fell apart into warring little factions?  It happens all the time, and in more and more churches than ever before.  This division in the Philippian Church was a matter of immense concern to the apostle Paul.

5)   The KJ has “Euodias,” which is a man’s name.  One of the early fathers thought that this was the Philippian jailer and his wife being spoken of, that they held a prominent place in the church at Philippi, had had a bit of a ‘falling out’ and had taken some other believers with them in this momentary retreat.  But the correct form is “Euodia,” a woman’s name; and these two women were at odds with one another.  Here are two believers, sisters in the Royal Family of God, at variance and in disagreement with each other.  You let two believers in a local church, especially two that are heavily involved in service, get at odds with one another, you let two believers get ‘out of sorts’ with each other and you have the makings of a split right there, a division right down the middle. 

What’s the solution?  It’s found in our second command in Christ, which is a command to ‘live in spiritual harmony.’  How can you possibly “live in harmony” unless you have stability?  How can we have spiritual harmony without spiritual stability?  It’s impossible.  In this next part of our study I’m going to use two terms synonymously— spiritual stability and personal stability.  That’s what stability “in the Lord” is: personal and spiritual.  Let’s get a few points on the idea of ‘harmony in the Lord.’ 

a.   Spiritual harmony is a result of personal stability.  Personal stability leads to group harmony.  It takes individual stability to have functional harmony within a group; it’s not something you can impose en masse.  A cohesive harmony among the various members of a local body can exist only as a result of their personal stability. 

b.   Harmony and unity, though often used as synonyms, are not necessarily the same.  E.g., in an orchestra or symphony you have many, many instruments.  Those instruments are all playing different parts, different notes, emitting their own distinct sounds, and yet with all the variation the final product is a majestic harmony.  Now, can you imagine the various musicians telling each other, “I don’t need you.  Your instrument, your style of playing, your skill is unnecessary.  We’d be better off without you.”?  Rather ridiculous, isn’t it? 

The instruments and musicians themselves don’t look the same, don’t sound the same, don’t produce the same notes.  What’s the application?  {Cf. 1 Corinthians 12:12-27}  According to Paul’s description of the Body of Christ in 1 Corinthians 12 no believer has a right to tell another member of the Royal Family that they’re unneeded, they’re unnecessary, there’s no place for them.  That attitude Paul speaks of in 1 Corinthians 12:21, of “the eye” saying “to the hand, ‘I have no need of you;’ or …the head” saying “to the feet, ‘I have no need of you,’” is the seedbed of division. 

c.   Churches, and individuals, often promote the idea of ‘unity’ when what they really mean is ‘conformity.’  This is legalistic conformity to a set of human viewpoint norms and standards, to rules and regulations imposed by religious leaders, religious boards, and religious organizations, i.e., by man, not by God!  It was not Paul’s desire to establish an organization, or the mechanics of human machinery; it was Paul’s desire to lay on each and every believer the burden and responsibility of knowing the Lord Jesus Christ in an intimate way.  

It’s an unfortunate thing in the time in which we live that organizations have been substituted for the living organism of the Body of Christ.  What we see all around us is organizations taking the place of the HS, organizations taking the place of the Word of God, organizations taking the place of the leading and guiding of the Spirit of God.  This is one of the problems with denominations; this, in my professional opinion, is one of the major problems with Christian organizations.  Believers become so involved with the organization, with its aims and its goals and its methods, that they leave no room for the latitude and leadership of the Spirit.  Organizations have a tendency of establishing their goals, setting up the way they’re going to get there, and then they just simply start rolling.  What happens is that spirituality falls by the wayside, what happens— and this is another great danger— is that people become loyal to organizations.  They become enamored with it and not with Christ.  One of the things that has been a plague and a curse to Christianity from the time of Pentecost down to the present has been the infighting and backstabbing in the Family of God because of the loyalty of Christians, not to Christ, not to the Word of God, but to organizations.  Principle: Devotion to a denomination, no matter how wonderful or right you think it is, is not our objective.  

d.   Harmony is not total conformity, nor loss of identity or individuality.  No one should ever be forced into a mold in which they don’t belong.  Let me give you a principle:  Conformity makes the religious soul comfortable.  The religious believer wants everyone to dress a certain way, to act a certain way, to utter all the proper pious phrases in just the right way.  You know what I love more than anything?  Believers who are not afraid to be themselves; believers who refuse to ‘fit the mold.’  I guarantee you when it comes to P-Ts, they have no mold for me …and they never will!  Why?  Because I’ve played that ludicrous game; and I recognize the principle that: Legalistic conformity is not the same as spirituality, nor does it lead to spiritual harmony.  It is simply a human attempt to mimic the reality of a Christ-centered life.  

Unity which is based on producing a whole slew of people cut out of the same mold all walking, talking, and acting the same is communism, not Christianity!  Harmony is not conformity, and it is not the loss of identity or individuality.  In fact, the more mature the members of a congregation, the more distinctiveness and individuality exists.  And I’ll tell you why.  Because once you get the essentials of life lined up and you learn what is truly important, with that comes a magnificent sense of obligation and freedom.  You’re not afraid to stand on your own, you’re not afraid to ‘run outside the herd,’ you’re not afraid to be yourself because maturity has tempered and even eradicated some of the baser aspects of your old self.  Therefore, you can live without fear in the realm of faith.  

Let me tell you something:  God doesn’t want you to be anybody but who you are.  Faithfulness and consistency, not ‘conformity of personality,’ are the keys!  Whoever came up with the ideas that we had to wear certain clothes or act certain ways?  “Well, this is the right way.”  Being someone who has spent a considerable amount of time on the foreign mission field, I can tell you that depends on where you are.  The norms and standards of culture— which is really what we’re talking about here— differ from country to country, from state to state in the US, from region to region, sometimes from city to city!  Who’s to say this is right for everybody?!

Who’s willing to stand in the place of God and make that judgment?  Why don’t you ask Job how well that works?  

Maybe what the Church needs in the 21st cent. is more spiritual non-conformists— believers who, while being spiritual, are not afraid to be themselves.  Americans as a people, and Christians in America, have lost their sense of individuality.  We say, “Whereas there used to be plenty, there are no frontiers left.”  But there is one: the frontier of the soul and spirit which feed on the Word of God— the possibilities and potential for growth in that life are unlimited.  There is another: the frontier of foreign missions.  There are “fields, …white unto harvest” covering this entire globe— John 4:35-36.  What is your personal involvement, what is my personal involvement, in harvesting those fields?

e.   Unstable believers who cannot have harmony, instead push for a unity which is really conformity.  What are we saying here?  Unstable people who don’t have the ability to stand on their own two feet and who can’t stand anyone rattling their rusty cage, want everybody to be exactly alike.  Unfortunately, for some reason, an extraordinary number of them believe they’ve been ‘called to preach,’ and so they wind up in pulpits all across this great land of ours.  They can’t stand to have anybody make them uncomfortable, so they begin to try to control people by imposing all these legalistic standards which have nothing to do with harmony and everything to do with conformity.  

f.    Personal stability minimizes friction and the arrogance that leads to division.  How?  By minimizing dependence on other people.  When you are spiritually autonomous, you don’t have to rely on the praise and approbation of other believers; and you don’t have to be bowed to or scraped before.  What happens is that as you mature you can allow people to differ, and to be individuals, even if you don’t like who they are as an individual, and yet there is no disruption of harmony. 

Personal stability does something else: it minimizes unrealistic expectations.  People who get disillusioned and who turn their backs on the plan of grace are people who are spiritually unstable.  They have no foundation of their own, and therefore, they have to use someone else as a crutch.  Their whole spiritual existence is leaning on someone else.  Instead of looking to Christ, they’re looking to people or to things or to a change of some kind in life.  This, of course, is a very dangerous position.  You know what God said to Jeremiah about this?  “Cursed is the man who trusts in mankind and makes flesh his strength and whose heart turns away from the LORD.  For he will be like a bush in the desert and will not see when prosperity comes, but will live in stony wastes in the wilderness, a land of salt without inhabitant,” Jeremiah 17:5-6.  You see, that one thing they desperately seek— that spiritual stability— will constantly elude them until they occupy themselves with Christ and Christ alone. 

g.   Harmony recognizes individuality and personal preference, then makes the most of the strong points of other believers.  We are not the same, so, why should we have to pretend like we are?  We don’t all like the same things, do we?  So, why should we have to pretend we do?  This is where ‘grace orientation to life’ comes in.  An orientation to grace allows me to be me, and you to be you— in all the latitude of our own personalities—

and yet, at the same time, both of us to be spiritual.  Did you ever think that maybe God brings some believers in to the Royal Family just to shake the religious crowd up?  That He gives them a sort of ‘gift of adversity,’ if you will?  When we can look at other believers, regardless of the differences that exist between us, and recognize that they have something to offer in the plan of God— a ministry, and a mission behind that ministry, a reason why they’re here— that shows great stability and great maturity.  

h.   Where spiritual stability exists, even out of dislike can come harmony.  This is the attitude that says to other believers, “Hey.  You’re part of the team, you’re part of the plan.”  This is the attitude that every local body ought to have.  Instead of exclusion there ought to be an attitude of inclusion. 

i.    There can be no harmony between believers unless it is “in the Lord.”  Think about all the powerful armies that have marched in human history.  Whatever your favorite sport happens to be, think about all the great teams and athletes you’ve watched in the past.  Think about the incredible achievements of so many great Americans in so many different areas of life.  What is it that ties all these things together?  Leadership …the leadership of great men.  

An army, a team, a company, a unit will never achieve greatness without first having great leaders.  Hebrews 12:2 calls Jesus Christ, “the Author and Perfecter of faith.”  The word “author” means- a leader, a ruler, an originator; one who begins something as the first in a series and thus supplies the driving force and purpose behind it.  It also say’s that we are to “fix our eyes on” Him, to focus our undivided attention and concentration on the One, “who for the joy set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God.”  Out of this, I have six points of application. 

i.    Enormous diversity is often held together by allegiance to an excellent leader.  Out of the shadows of history come men like King David, Cyrus of Persia, the Spartan king Leonidas, Alexander the Great, Hannibal, Augustus, Napoleon, and on and on.  That loyalty to each other, and toward the mutual objective, depends entirely upon their loyalty to him.  

ii.    Take the leader away and the group disintegrates into isolated units, oftentimes at war with one another. 

iii.   Believers are not commanded to show loyalty to human organizations but to be loyal to the Person of Christ.  Paul in Colossians 3:4 speaks of “Christ, who is our life…;” in vv. 1-3 he said, “Therefore if you have been raised up with Christ [‘and you have, through union with Him at / moment of salvation’], keep seeking the things above, where Christ is seated at the right hand of God.  Set your mind on the things above [this is phroneo- ‘keep thinking, constantly and continually, about things of eternal value’], not on the things that are on earth [i.e., don’t get bound in / details and distractions of / CS;

Paul’s saying that we must maintain an eternal perspective at all times, an eternal outlook on life, especially when things are at their worst; pr: To look at / ‘big picture,’ to look at life from / divine viewpoint, is / only way to survive in / Conflict and succeed in /Cause.].  For you have died,” Paul say’s, “and your life is hidden with Christ in God [that is a picture of our identification with His death, burial, resurrection and ascension].”  

iv.   Misplaced loyalty leads to misplaced priorities.  When your loyalty lies with an organization, a party or a person, and not with the Person of Christ, your scale of ‘spiritual values’ is completely out of kilter.  Which, in effect, means no execution of the will of God.  Most of Christianity either doesn’t comprehend or just doesn’t care, and therefore, ignores the fact that our lives must line up with His will or else they are wasted in the divine economy.  And it’s our attitude, it’s our thinking, it’s our action with His will, not the other way around!  {Cf. Habitation of Dragons, ‘Renewal in the Church, but who cares enough,’ p. 179}  

v.    Believers will never have harmony with one another until they have intimacy with Christ.  As Paul told the Galatians, “I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live but Christ lives in me…,” 2:20.  

When we come to “know” Christ experientially, as Paul had in Philippians 3:10-11, we find that spiritual harmony, even with those in our assembly who differ from us tremendously, is really not that difficult after all.  Because, you see, our focus is not on them, and it’s not selfishly on us, it’s on the glorification of Christ.  In the end, that’s the only thing that matters for eternity. 

vi.   Last, but certainly not least: Our love for other believers will never be experiential until our love, our passion, our devotion to Christ is real.  In Ephesians 3:17-19 Paul’s prayer, not just for the Ephesians but for all believers, is that we “…being rooted and grounded [‘stabilized and secured;’ where?] in love, may be able to comprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth, and to know the love of Christ which surpasses knowledge, that” we “may be filled up to all the fullness of God.”  

C.   Moving on, who is the “true companion” in v. 3?  “Indeed, true companion, I ask you also to help these women.”  Why would he make a request like this?  Because Paul realized that somebody was going to have to act as a mediator.  Two people involved in a serious dispute rarely solve it themselves.  In our lawsuit-obsessed country, it normally takes a judge and a jury of their peers to solve something.  

1)   The word “help” is the pres. mid. imp. of sullamba/nw (sullambano), another plea on behalf of Euodia and Syntyche.  Lambano means- ‘take hold of;’ sun means- ‘with;’ so lit.- take hold of together, and then, in the mid. voice- come to the aid of someone, help or assist somebody.  To the “true comrade” Paul said, “I want you to take hold of this problem, this conflict, this disagreement, together with these two women, and let’s find a solution.”  That is precisely what a ‘mediator’ does;

he intercedes, he mediates between two parties in order to find a solution.  Isn’t that what Christ did for us?  Act as a Mediator to secure the ‘salvation solution.’  

2)   Suzugos means- ‘yoked together,’ a comrade, a colleague, in the same sense that the Latin commilito speaks of fellow-gladiators in the arena. Each gladiator was his opponent’s suzugos. 

3)   I believe that the “true comrade” was Luke.  Luke is an interesting character, a Gentile in what was in the very early Church a world of Jewish believers.  He is the only Gentile author in the entire NT.  A little background:  

a.   Luke traveled with Paul all over the ancient world, and he was always there for him— steady and faithful— always alongside the apostle Paul in labors and hardships.  In fact in 2 Timothy 4:11, in the last letter Paul wrote before his execution at the hands of the Roman Empire, he said, “only Luke is with me….”  

b.   In Acts 16:10 there is a change from the 3rd p. to the 1st, from “they” to “we.”  This is where Luke joined up with Paul, at “Troas,” the site of ancient Troy.  “Concluding that God had called” them “to preach the gospel” in Europe, where do they go?  “To Philippi, …a leading city of the district of Macedonia, a {Roman} colony.”  The person of the narrative changes again in this ch. and when Paul and Silas depart Philippi for Thessalonica— 16:40-17:1— Luke stays behind.  Could be that Luke was a native of Philippi, but even more probable is that Paul left him there to care for this fledgling church.  This was, after all, the first place the Gospel was ever preached by Paul in Europe. 

c.   Luke, more than likely, is the ‘renowned brother’ mentioned in 2 Corinthians 8:18.  When Paul sent Titus— another Gentile, who was believed to be Luke’s brother— to collect the funds for the Jerusalem Church, he said, “We have sent along with him the brother whose fame in {the things of} the Gospel {has spread} through all the churches.”  This ‘famous’ believer, this one “whose fame” had spread “through all the churches,” was usually identified in the early Church with Luke.  Even so, even with this tremendous recognition, he always chose to stay in the background.  In fact, there are only three times that he is mentioned by name in the NT. 

d.   In one of these, Colossians 4:14, Paul refers to him as “the beloved physician”— a doctor of the soul.  His skills could help cure the body but it was his message that healed the soul.  

4)   Many scholars believe that Luke, “true companion” that he was, wrote the Book of Acts as a defense of Paul’s ministry after his first imprisonment.  Because Paul had come under terrible attack, not from the CS but from the rank and file of the Royal Army, some of them his very own disciples.  If you remove 1 Timothy and Titus— both ‘pastoral epistles’ dealing with shepherds and the care of their flocks— written around 65 AD, these are ‘silent years’ between Paul’s ‘prison epistles’ in AD 60-61 and his final imprisonment and martyrdom in late 67 or early 68 AD.

Some believe that these were the greatest years of his ministry, and that he reached a more vast area in those few years of silence than in all the years of his ministry up to that point.  

History records that he reached Spain during this time, possibly Gaul, and others believe he went as far as Britain and ministered among the Celtic tribes.  Yet from Paul himself we have no word during this time, nothing, at least none that has survived.  I’ll tell you what I think happened: I think maybe he got tired of defending himself, defending his ministry, defending his methods; that maybe he said, “You know what, it doesn’t matter— all the slander, all the maligning, all the jealousy and envy, all this criticism from other believers.  There’s no one left but Christ, and He’s the only One that counts!  And so I’ll just leave it in His hands, and allow the Master to use me any way He will!” 

5)   What Paul wants his ‘esteemed colleague’ to do is work “together with Clement also and the rest of” his “fellow workers.”  I.e., two things are going to happen here: [1] they’re going to gather together as a team, as a harmonious unit, and from the Word deal with the problem; and [2] he’s going to lead the way in resolving it.  I think there is a significant point here, and it relates to the spiritual harmony we studied in this section:  When there was a conflict at Philippi, a quarrel which— at least for these two ladies— seemed irresolvable, Paul mobilized the entire body to resolve it.  That’s not going to be necessary every time you have a disagreement in a local church, but it does show that he was not afraid of utilizing his resources; it shows that Paul thought no effort too extensive to maintain the peace and equilibrium of this local body.  Here is the principle which comes out of this: No one can be at harmony with God— in fellowship with Christ— and at war with other believers! 

D.   In the third command, found in v. 4, Paul twice challenges the Philippians to “rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, rejoice!”  Here he used chairete, the pres. act. imper. of xai/rw (chairo)- be filled with joy, rejoice exceedingly.  The 2nd pl. embraces every member of the Royal Family. 

1)   The word for “always” means- ‘at all times,’ and only serves to heighten the sense of the command.  This would be in the pres. act. imper.: ‘keep on, every moment of your lives, rejoicing exceedingly, keep on constantly being filled with joy.’  Why …because of circumstance?  No, because of who Christ is, and what you have in Him!  

2)   Notice out of the command to “stand firm” in v. 1 comes the command to “live in harmony;” out of the command to “live in harmony” comes the command to “rejoice in the Lord.”  Not just when things are going your way but “always!”  This means when things are bad, when things are hopeless, when things are painful— through the tears, through the pain, through the suffering— “rejoice in the Lord always,” and “again I …say, rejoice!”  He emphasizes it twice here because he wants to express the importance of joy as a PSD. 

In Conclusion 

Basically, what we have in these first 4 vv. is a very simple format of magnificent spirituality in action! 

 1.   Stability in the Lord, which is a result of stability in the Word. 

 2.   Harmony with one another.  It takes spiritual stability to have spiritual harmony. 

 3.  Joy and rejoicing.  Maybe you’ve noticed on occasion but people don’t tend to rejoice— even though they could— where there is no harmony.  And believers who have no stability in their lives have no foundation for joy in their souls!  

The amazing thing is that we create disharmony, and then are unhappy or disappointed or disillusioned because disharmony exists, when we’re the only ones who can solve it.  The solution to disharmony goes back to our stability in Christ.  We have to be willing to plant our feet on the Rock of the Word and to say, of ourselves and others, “I am a member of the Royal Family of God.  I have a divine anointing in the Spirit of God; I have a spiritual gift given by that same HS and a mission associated with my ministry.  I am a priest, an ambassador, and a minister of grace.  I am available to be used in the plan of God, and therefore, I can leave it all in His hands.  It’s not up to me to fulfill anything in my strength; it’s not up to me to accomplish anything by my energy.  It’s all Christ, or it’s nothing at all!”  

I want to close with a couple of vv. from Psalm 119.  The writer, a young captive on the slave-march to Babylon, prays these words in vv. 116-117.  “Sustain me according to Your Word, that I may live [this is his prayer for divine strength]; and do not let me be ashamed of my hope [‘my confidence in / Lord God of Israel and my assurance in His plan’].  Uphold me that I may be safe [you see his desire for spiritual stability], that I may have regard for your statutes continually [this is / only place where stability exists, when / Word of God is being applied constantly and ‘continually’].”  

Psalm 119 is written as an acrostic poem, with each line of each section beginning with a letter of the Hebrew alphabet.  These two vv. come from the Samekh (  ) section.  “The samekh pictures a fulcrum, the prop or support on which a lever rests.  It represents the enabling power of the Word of God.  The Word is the rock; our faith is the lever.  When we rest our faith on the Word, we have the power to move any obstacle because God ‘is able to do far more abundantly beyond all that we ask or think, according to the power that works within us,’” Ephesians 3:20.  Cunningham, Psalm 119, The Diary of a Captive, p. 94


 

“A BALANCED SPIRITUALITY”

Philippians 4:4-5

 

(click here to view in Word format)

 

Introduction

 When you look at the course of history since the Day of Pentecost 30 AD, you see that some of the greatest blows the enemy has dealt the Church have come from within— within the bounds of ‘Christendom {meaning all those— believers and unbelievers— who name the name of Christ};’ and even today from within Christianity itself.  When Christianity becomes slanted and distorted, when Christians lose their balance and their sense of priority and perspective, then we end up with something which is no longer genuine.  The Life in the truest sense of the term— the joy, the power, the vitality— has drained out of it.  My prayer is that in this study we will recognize the qualities that make for a ‘balanced spirituality,’ and therefore, a balanced maturity.  It is imperative in the time in which we live when there is so much imbalance, when there is so much loss of focus and perspective, when there is so much preoccupation with the wrong things and apathy toward the right things, that we as believers not only have a clear understanding of what the Word teaches, but also the ability to apply it in a balanced manner… that we have this ‘spiritual equilibrium’ in our lives. 

The plan of God is to stabilize life, and we studied this in detail.  The Word of God gives stability; the Word of God is the only solid foundation in this universe!  That stability enables us to move from the Cross to the Crown ( illustrate ): always keeping our eyes focused on Christ, our mind riveted on eternity, and always knowing where we’re going and why we’re here. 

We dealt briefly with v. 4 in our last passage in Philippians, vv. 1-4, but I want to bring it into this section as well, because when taken together with v. 5 of Philippians 4 we have a concept.  It’s one which Paul is going to carry forward in both principle and practice down through v. 9— the concept of a ‘balanced spirituality.’  Paul say’s, “Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, rejoice!  Let your forbearing [or in some translations, ‘your gentle’] {spirit} be known to all men.  [then he adds, for] The Lord is near,” Philippians 4:4-5.  Let me read the rest of the section for you as well, to give you an idea of the full context.  {Read vv. 6-9} 

Body 

 1.  Remember from our previous study that this is a command in v. 4, a command to “rejoice in the Lord” at all times and in all things.  It is repeated twice to emphasize the importance of spiritual joy as a PSD.  Paul uses the term “joy” seven times, and the terms “rejoice” or “rejoiced” {past tense} nine times in the book of Philippians.  That’s sixteen times in what, at four chs., is a relatively short letter.  

A.  “Joy” is from the noun chara; “rejoice” is from the verb chairo.  Chairo was sometimes used in the ancient world for the celebration of a victory on the battlefield.  In application it means- ‘celebrate the victory of grace.’

At the Cross Jesus Christ won the ultimate victory, the eternal victory; we call it the ‘Strategic Victory of the Angelic Conflict.’  He broke Satan’s back at the Cross, and He broke open the gates of Satan’s POW camp— the Cosmic System.  If you have believed in Him then you have relationship with Christ forever, and if you have relationship with the Son then you have relationship with the Father.  And in that relationship you have power, privilege and opportunity greater than anything you can even imagine. 

1)   How often do we give thanks for the Strategic Victory of Jesus Christ?  How much time during the course of a day do we give to thought and reflection on the victory of Christ?  How many times— while the battle is raging everywhere around us— in our own souls, do we stop and take the time to celebrate the victory of Christ and the victory of grace?  Paul did; and the reason he could endure, the reason he could press on and on and on in his own spiritual advance and in his service for the cause of Christ, was because he focused, not on circumstances around him, not on the pressure and adversity he faced each and every day, not on the problems themselves, but on the solution— the Person of Jesus Christ. 

Maybe if we spent more time getting to know our Lord and Savior intimately and personally, maybe if we focused just a little bit of our daily energy and effort on the celebration of His Victory and the unavoidable destiny we have in Him, life might not look so bleak, boring and hopeless after all.  The adventure might just begin anew with the right spiritual perspective, with a depth of understanding and appreciation for grace.  Do not ever allow yourself to forget that as “sons of God,” as “Abraham’s offspring” and “heirs according to promise,” we are moving like a juggernaut towards an inevitable destiny in Christ.  Now, if that’s not cause for celebration, if that’s not cause for throwing a victory party in your own soul, then nothing is! 

2)   I want to give you a principle here:  There is nothing in life which Christ has not overcome.  Nothing.  The basic function of joy is spoken of in John 16:33 when our Lord said, “In the world you have tribulation [you have testing, you have crisis, you have disaster]; but take courage, I have overcome the world.”  Here’s the issue:  If your focus is in the world, the best that you can hope and strive and struggle for is happiness.  But happiness, by nature, is always going to be fleeting; happiness will always be transient and temporary.  You can mark that down as fact!  But if your focus is “in the Lord”— in His will and His purpose and His plan— then you can have joy.  Over here what happens to you is everything; over here what happens to you is nothing.  We all have trials, we all have tribulation, these things are a part of the “world;” but Christ has “overcome the world,” and everything it contains! 

B.   If there is one thing we ought to take away from a study of this book, one lesson that must be learned for the future, it’s that joy has nothing to do with material prosperity or with the outward circumstances of life!  It is an undisputed fact of human existence that people can live in the ‘lap of luxury’ and be wretchedly miserable, and others can live in the ‘pit of poverty’ and their lives overflow with joy.  The difference is in the soul.  One man knows because of his faith in the Word and in the Lord that his life, at best, is a transient existence, a momentary blip on the radar screen of history.  The other is pouring everything he has into temporal existence.  One lives and breathes in the light of eternity; the other is consumed by the darkness of the Kosmos!  You better hear this next principle, because it corresponds not only to this generation but to our country as a whole:  The more selfish and self-centered we are, the more miserable and unhappy we’re going to be.

One of the reasons that Christian joy is lacking in Christian lives is because intimacy with Christ is lacking in Christian lives.  The secret of spiritual joy is this: that joy doesn’t depend on things or places or people, but on the Person of Jesus Christ.  The Christian is “in Christ,” the one faithful and immutable Rock in a world of shifting sand— vacillating and unstable; hence, the importance of a joy that is built on spiritual stability, on the rock-solid foundation we have in Christ.  Nothing can ever separate us from His presence, therefore, nothing can ever take away our joy.  We may choose, through arrogance and apathy, to forfeit it, but when we stand by faith on the Word of God nothing and no one can take it from us! 

 2.  In vv. 4-5 the apostle Paul sets before the Philippians the two great qualities that make for a balanced spiritual life. 

A.  The first is what we just finished looking at: our joy in Christ, and in the riches and resources, eternal and abundant, that we have in Him.  “Rejoice in the Lord always;” and “again I …say rejoice!”  It’s almost as if Paul, after laying out the command to celebrate the victory of grace constantly and continually, sees a picture of what is to come flash across his mind.  He himself is in a Roman prison with a sentence of death hanging over his head.  The Philippians to whom he’s writing are out there on the Way as he speaks, on the Priority Path, and there are dark days of danger and persecution ahead. 

1)   Cf. Barclay’s introduction to 1 Peter on persecution in the Roman Empire.  {A vast persecution was about to break out in Rome and reach Macedonia shortly thereafter.} 

2)   Consider this:  Paul is chained wrist to wrist with revolving members of the Praetorian Guard.  He has joy …an unconquerable joy at that; the soldiers guarding him do not.  Remember that Philippians, as one of the ‘Prison Epistles,’ was written in 60-61 AD.  The Philippians are going to face tremendous persecution in the coming decade, and were already under intense pressure.  Paul spoke of this in 1:29-30 when he said, “to you it has been granted for Christ’s sake, not only to believe in Him but also to suffer for His sake, experiencing the same conflict which you saw in me, and now hear {is} in me.”  The Philippians had a phenomenal spiritual joy, however; those with the power to persecute them did not. 

3)   So Paul, in essence, is saying, “After seeing everything that can possibly happen— all the pain, all the pressure, all the suffering and affliction— I still say, adamantly, rejoice!”  Why this command to ‘rejoice regardless’ {which would not be a bad translation} and to keep on celebrating the victory of Christ?  Because: 

a.   Spiritual joy is independent of circumstance or surroundings.  It is an inner condition of the soul. 

b.   Spiritual joy is independent of all worldly things because its source is the personal Presence of Jesus Christ! 

B.   The second quality is found in the command to “Let your forbearing {spirit} be known to all men.”  Here is where we find the other half of a ‘balanced spirituality.’  The word translated “forbearance,” or “gentleness,” is epieikes, an adjective used as a substantive with the def. art.;

epieikes is synonymous with the noun e)piei/keia (epieikeia), and both refer to a certain graciousness of character, to the exercise of mercy in dealing with others. 

1)   Why this particular word?  Because what we’re dealing with in this section is a concept, and that concept is one of balance in the spiritual life.  Principle:  Balanced spirituality is the only thing which can lead to a balanced spiritual life.  Therefore, in v. 5 we have the command which represents this, the command to “let” our “forbearing spirit be known.”  Now, to us in English that doesn’t really mean much, that doesn’t really communicate.  That might mean simply ‘being nice’ to people; it might mean ‘being patient’ with people; to some it might mean treating people as frail and fragile creatures— kind of like an eggshell. 

2)   You can see how difficult this word is in the number of translations that have been given it by scholars in the past.  Wycliffe {who lived in the 14th cent. and was the first man to make a complete translation of the Bible into English} translated it ‘patience;’ Tyndale was another English reformer, executed for his faith and labor— he had ‘softness’ {horrible}; the Geneva Bible has ‘a patient mind;’ the Rheims Bible, ‘modesty;’ Moffat translated it ‘forbearance;’ Weymouth, ‘the forbearing spirit.’  What does it really mean, “let your forbearing {spirit} be known to all men?”  Before I deal with the word I want to explain the reason for it. 

a.   The reason that Paul makes this command is because we as human beings have such a tendency to twist and distort things.  Most of you know this from experience— either with people in the past or in the present, in certain Christian settings and certain Christian groups or denominations— that those who are the supposedly ‘spiritual’ believers are the most miserable people to be around.  And we all know by now that misery doesn’t love company, misery demands company! 

Throughout Church history, the people who have assumed the mantle of righteousness, the people who have promoted and presented themselves as being the ‘spiritual elite,’ have been unbalanced in some way.  This ranges from the weird and the uptight ‘better than thou,’ to the downright devious and evil.  On the ascetic extreme, you find the puritanical legalist who condemns almost everything: if you smile, you’ve been up to something; if you laugh, then we know you’ve been bad; if there is a group laughing over here in a corner of the room, having a good time and enjoying themselves, then there is definitely some ‘unrighteous mischief’ afoot. 

b.   Where do we get such warped ideas as those which still affect millions of believers today?  Things like: women can’t wear makeup; women must wear dresses, they can’t be allowed to wear pants or jeans; a man must wear a black suit, or just a suit, or {in the Philippines} a barong to church; an evangelist must use half a can of Aqua Net on his coif before entering the pulpit.  You get the idea.  The reason we know that these things are unabashed legalisms and not absolute Truth is because these ridiculous standards change anytime the appropriate ‘authorities’— whoever that happens to be: a pastor, group leader, the ladies training union, the convention— decide it’s time for them to change. 

The reason for all this is because these are people who are off-balance; these are examples of ‘unbalanced spirituality.’

And it is the very opposite of what Jesus and the disciples were like.  You don’t see this in our Lord.  In the life of the Lord Jesus Christ you see a perfect blend that brought about balanced spirituality.  John 1:14 says, “And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory [you know what ‘glory’ is?; ‘glory’ is a manifestation of / character and essence of God], glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.”  

And so, what Paul’s striving for in this passage is a balance to the spiritual life, a believer neither underwhelmed nor overwhelmed with anything except the Lord Jesus Christ.  Because He is to be the consuming passion of our lives, and nothing else can be allowed to take His place. 

3)   The phrase “let …be known” is the aor. imper. of gi/nwskw (ginosko), and ginosko means- come to know; understand; or realize something.  In the pass. voice it means- become known. 

a.   The aor. imper. is an authoritative command, a command of military urgency; i.e., “since it’s obvious this quality is lacking in some of your lives, do it now.”  It has a solemnity and seriousness about it.  “Begin making it known,” he say’s.  “Let it become known and realized and understood with everyone.”  

The aor. imper. tells us that Paul saw in the Philippian Church not only the flaw of division, of believers choosing sides and looking out for their own selfish interests, but a lack of forbearance, a lack of grace and mercy in dealing with others.  Paul saw the peculiar flaw, as he would in any number of churches around the world today, of unbalanced spirituality.  He saw the flaw of a contemptuous attitude toward believers who look different, or dress different, or don’t speak like we speak and don’t like what we like.  That brings us to the principle that:  A sanctimonious, self-righteous attitude is as far  from true spirituality as you can possibly get.  Paul knew that; and so he sets out to deal with it in our passage.  The application would be especially personal particularly for Euodia and Syntyche, the quarreling ladies in v. 2.  

b.   Here the aor. imper. is found in the pass. voice, which is why we have the milder translation of “let be known.”  The very nature of epieikeia precludes a forcefulness in its exercise, or any desire to garner approbation and acclaim.  Those are contrary to what it’s all about.  This v. is saying, “Let your forbearance become known to all men.  Let your forbearing spirit be understood by all; let it be realized in your relationships with others.”  Then we have our word: epieikeia.